Thursday, March 9, 2023

S.138 of NI Act, 1881 : An Important View of Supreme Court

 S.138 of NI Act, 1881 : An Important View of Supreme Court


In context of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, an important Judgment was passed on 1 August 2014 by Hon'ble Supreme Court.


It has been commented at page 20, 21 of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v State of Maharashtra [2014] GCtR 2731 (SC) thus : - 

"The infusion of the concept of ‘cause of action’ into the criminal dispensation has led to subsequent confusion countenanced in High Courts."

"Courts are enjoined to interpret the law so as to eradicate ambiguity or nebulousness, and to ensure that legal proceedings are not used as a device for harassment, even of an apparent transgressor of the law. Law’s endeavour is to bring the culprit to book and to provide succour for the aggrieved party but not to harass the former through vexatious proceedings. Therefore, precision and exactitude are necessary especially where the location of a litigation is concerned."


Kindly note that full text Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court can be downloaded absolutely free of cost from the official website at the link https://main.sci.gov.in/judgments - Then entering the date of Judgment, for example, as 1 August 2014.


Written by 

Vishal

Delhi

Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction.  



No comments:

Post a Comment

Cheque Dishonour under S.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 : Who can Maintain a Complaint for Cheque Dishonour

Cheque Dishonour under S.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 : Who can Maintain a Complaint for Cheque Dishonour  In the case of Milind ...