S.138, NI Act, 1881 and the Role of Magistrate
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is an important provision.
Hon'ble Bombay High Court has passed an important Judgment on 7 December 2010.
In context of Section 138 of said Act, in Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke v State of Maharashtra [2010] GCtR 2940 (Bombay), it was explained thus : -
"After addition of section 145 NI Act in the statute book, it is open to the Magistrate to issue process on the basis of the contents of the complaint, the documents in support thereof and the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of the complaint. Once the complainant files an affidavit in support of the complaint before issuance of the process under Section 200 CrPC, it is thereafter open to the Magistrate, if he thinks it fit, to call upon the complainant to remain present and to examine him as to the facts contained in the affidavit submitted by the complainant in support of his complaint. But then it is a matter of discretion and the Magistrate is not bound to call upon the complainant to remain present before the Court and to examine him upon oath for taking decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under Section 138 of NI Act."
Kindly note that full text Judgments of Hon'ble Bombay High Court can be downloaded absolutely free of cost (without any charges except internet data) from the official website at the link
https://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/index.php
Then entering the date of Judgment.
Written by
Vishal
Delhi
Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction.
Good citation
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDelete