"Not Producing Accused before Medical Officer" : Police Deptt Directed to Pay Compensation and Take Disciplinary Action against Police Officers

"Not Producing Accused before Medical Officer" : Police Deptt Directed to Pay Compensation and Take Disciplinary Action against Police Officers

There are many cases where police acts in contravention of law.

In one of the important case citation [2019] GCtR 4217, the procedure adopted by police officials was found wrong.

Finally, police department was directed to pay compensation to accused.

Police department was also given liberty to recover said amount from the concerned police officers.

Police department was also rightly given direction to initiate disciplinary action against concerned police officials.

Conclusion

Law laid down in [2019] GCtR 4217 must be applied in all deserving cases against employees of public sector banks/LIC whenever due to wrong decisions of those employees of public sector banks/LIC, anyone has to suffer and any costs of litigation must invariably be recovered from the salaries of concerned employees of public sector banks/LIC and disciplinary proceedings must be instituted against those employees in all deserving cases.  This will ensure that only efficient employees continue in public sector banks/LIC and those who care nothing about law or who do not wish to know what is compliance of law are shown the doors as early as possible.

Written by 

Vishal

Delhi

Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters/blogs without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957. This is not to be considered as any professional legal advice and does not constitute client-attorney relationship.