Rape of a Minor : HC Upholds Conviction of Accused
In a recently decided case, conviction has been upheld.
In Ananda v State of Maharashtra [2024] GCtR 204 (Aurangabad, Bombay), the person was convicted for offence under S.376 (2) of IPC and for offences under POCSO Act, 2012.
It was noted that "in case of rape, non-appearance of injury is insignificant" and "absence of injury or mark of violence on the private parts or elsewhere on the person of the prosecutrix is of no consequence when the prosecutrix is minor and would merely suggest want of violent resistance on the part of the prosecutrix".
Conviction of accused was found valid.
Written by
Vishal
Delhi
Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters/blogs without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made by the violator. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957. This is not to be considered as any professional legal advice and does not constitute client-attorney relationship.
No comments:
Post a Comment