It has been held in Mamman Khan v. State of Haryana [2025] GCtR 1505 (SC) that a person's "status as a sitting MLA cannot, by itself, justify a separate trial. All accused stand equal before the law, and preferential segregation militates against the equality principle enshrined in Article 14. While the right to speedy trial is an essential facet of Article 21, it cannot be secured at the cost of fairness."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Scope of Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Answered in a recent Judgment passed in July 2026
Scope of Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Answered in a recent Judgment passed in July 2026 S.9 of Arbitration and Concil...
-
Advocate Empanelment Notice by Government Organisation : Last Date to apply to Expire Before 16 January 2026 Advocate Empanelment Last date ...
-
Vacancy for Law Graduates in a Govt Organisation : Remuneration More than Rs. 94,500/- p.m. A Reputed Govt organisation has issued notice fo...
-
Criminal Law : Important Judgments of May 2026 Written in Memory of Late Shri R.P. Mishra, Prayagraj 1. In case of Jagabandhu Jena v. State ...
No comments:
Post a Comment