Saturday, October 4, 2025

Written Agreements For Property in India : Whether Signatures of Both Parties Are Necessary ?

Written Agreements For Property in India : Whether Signatures of Both Parties Are Necessary ?

The principle that emerges from Alka Bose v. Parmatma Devi [2008] GCtR 5672 (SC) is that in certain situations agreement of sale signed only by the vendor was valid and enforceable by the purchaser.

It was held that an agreement of sale is an unilateral contract is not correct. An unilateral contract refers to a gratuitous promise where only party makes a promise without a return promise.

All agreements of sale are bilateral contracts as promises are made by both – the vendor agreeing to sell and the purchaser agreeing to purchase.

An agreement of sale comes into existence when the vendor agrees to sell and the purchaser agrees to purchase, for an agreed consideration on agreed terms. It can be oral. It can be by exchange of communications which may or may not be signed. It may be by a single document signed by both parties. It can also be by a document in two parts, each party signing one copy and then exchanging the signed copy as a consequence of which the purchaser has the copy signed by the vendor and a vendor has a copy signed by the purchaser. Or it can be by the vendor executing the document and delivering it to the purchaser who accepts it.

Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent by the parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not expressly declared to be void under the provisions of the Contract Act. The proviso to section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 makes it clear that the section will not apply to contracts which are required to be made in writing or in the presence of witnesses or any law relating to registration of documents. When there is no law applicable in Bihar at the relevant time, which requires an agreement of sale to be made in writing or in the presence of witnesses or to be registered, then even an oral agreement to sell is valid.

If so, a written agreement signed by one of the parties, if it evidences such an oral agreement will also be valid. In any agreement of sale, the terms are always negotiated and thereafter reduced in the form of an agreement of sale and signed by both parties or the vendor alone (unless it is by a series of offers and counter-offers by letters or other modes of recognized communication). In India, an agreement of sale signed by the vendor alone and delivered to the purchaser, and accepted by the purchaser, has always been considered to be a valid contract.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Evidence in a Claim in Arbitral Proceedings : Supreme Court Explains the Principles

Evidence in a Claim in Arbitral Proceedings : Supreme Court Explains the Principles "While the quantum of evidence required to accept a...