Delhi Riots 2020 : Supreme Court's Observations in Umar Khalid's Case
It has been held that S.43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, represents a legislative judgment that offences alleged to implicate the security of the State warrant a distinct bail regime. The constitutional role of the Court is neither to mechanically enforce the statutory embargo nor to neutralise it by invocation of liberty as straight-jacket formula, but to apply it with disciplined scrutiny.
Gulfisha Fatima v. State (GNCTD) [2026] GCtR 1 (SC)
To obtain full text PDF Copy of this Judgment Free of cost on your email address, please mention your email address in the "Comments" Section.
No comments:
Post a Comment