Role of Civil Courts under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : Supreme Court Explains the Law
The extension of mandate or substitution of an arbitrator under S. 29A does not partake the character of “appointment” under S.11, but is a measure designed to ensure timely conclusion of arbitration. It is incorrect to argue that there will be hierarchical difficulties, conflict of power or jurisdictional anomaly if a Civil Court entertains application under S. 29A for extension of time of an arbitral tribunal if the High Court under S. 11(6) of the Act has appointed the arbitrator(s) is untenable.
Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule [2026] GCtR 73 (SC)
No comments:
Post a Comment