Date of Issuance of Cheque and its Effect on Acquittal in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
In an interesting case [Ghanshyam D. Katira v. Sanjay J. Ganatra [2015] GCtR 6582 (Bombay)], the defence of the accused in case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is that he had not taken any loan of Rs.1,50,000 from the complainant.
It was held that when cheque No.440855 had been issued in the year 1998, the possibility of the next cheque – bearing No. 440856 – having been issued in the year 2006 – i.e. after a gap of eight years – is rather remote; and this aspect is capable of rendering the version of the accused, plausible. The accused was acquitted.
The other issue noted was that there is also some confusion as to whether the loan in question was given by the complainant in his capacity as a 'money lender'. It is not only because the same has been described as a 'friendly loan', but also because the money lenders business is being done by the complainant in the name of 'Harshal Money Lender'. The cheque has not been issued in favour of 'Harshal Money Lender'.
HC noted that the version of the complainant about the date, on which a loan was advanced to the accused, and the date on which the accused gave a cheque towards the purported repayment thereof, cannot be relied upon. The story put forth by the complainant cannot be accepted as true.
No comments:
Post a Comment