Friday, February 6, 2026

Essentials of Prosecution under PMLA, 2002 Explained by High Court

Essentials of Prosecution under PMLA, 2002 Explained by High Court

Law relating to PMLA, 2002 was explained in Manoj Kumar Babulal Punamiya v. State of Jharkhand [2025] GCtR 1919 (Jharkhand) and the petition filed by accused was dismissed. S.2(1)(u) of PMLA, 2002 indicates that in the explanation it has been referred that for removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that "proceeds of crime" include property not only derived or obtained from the scheduled offence but also any property which may directly or indirectly be derived or obtained as a result of any criminal activity relatable to the scheduled offence.

In this case, accused in ECIR under PMLA, 2002 was not an accused in the FIR of scheduled offence and HC dismissed the petition of accused filed in respect of prosecution under PMLA, 2002.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Cheque Dishonour under S.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 : Who can Maintain a Complaint for Cheque Dishonour

Cheque Dishonour under S.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 : Who can Maintain a Complaint for Cheque Dishonour  In the case of Milind ...