Indirect Tax and GST : Legal Principles of Investigation by Department and Rights of Assessee Explained in a Recent Judgment of June 2026
In a recent judgment it has been held that the gravity of the economic offences, which impact the financial health of the country, can never be underestimated and has been vociferously emphasized. Case was related to e-way bills, non filing of returns and S.70 and S.174 of CGST Act, 2017.
Whenever the GST Department has reason to believe that any fraud is being committed by a Company, it has the statutory right to conduct an investigation and, upon detection of any fraud, to proceed against the persons responsible in accordance with law.
It was noted that considering that there was no imminent threat of arrest and, therefore, no case for anticipatory bail was made out, the learned ASJ, in his wisdom, while dismissing the Anticipatory Bail Applications, had merely directed that seven days' prior notice be given before taking any coercive action, which is in consonance with the principles of natural justice and affords the assessee an opportunity to avail their remedies in accordance with law, in the event of any apprehension of arrest.
To conclude, no blanket protection has been granted to the assessee; rather, specific directions have been issued requiring them to join the investigation, in accordance with law. It is only seven days' prior notice that has been directed to be given to the Respondents by the Petitioner in the event that any coercive step is proposed to be taken by the Petitioner in the present matter, which cannot be held to be a blanket protection against all crimes, in future.
Case reference is DGGSTI v. Girish Sachdeva [2026] GCtR 379 (Delhi)
No comments:
Post a Comment