Delhi HC Decisions : February 2026 : Part 1
- Prabhroop Kaur Kapoor v. Union of India [2026] GCtR 108 (Delhi)
- Devyanshi Suryavanshi v. SSC [2026] GCtR 109 (Delhi)
- TROPICAL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD v VITTHAL CASHEW INDUSTRIES & ANR. [2026] GCtR 107 (Delhi)
- ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS LIMITED v BATRA BREWERIES AND DISTILLERIES Pvt. Ltd [2026] GCtR 110 (Delhi)
- Bhaskar Yadav v. ED [2026] GCtR 82 (Delhi)
- Jay Fe Cylinders Ltd v. Manish Jain [2026] GCtR 111 (Delhi)
- Zreyah Semiconducturs Pvt. Ltd v. Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd [2026] GCtR 112 (Delhi)
- Pawan Kumar v. Sandeep Goel [2026] GCtR 113 (Delhi)
- Dr. Vinod Kumar Jain v. Union of India [2026] GCtR 119 (Delhi) has held that when the language of a statutory rule is clear and unambiguous, the Court must give effect to its plain meaning. The substituted Rule 56(bb), of Fundamental Rules read as a whole, leaves little room for doubt that the age of superannuation remains 62 years and that continuation up to 65 years is conditional and confined to specified functional roles.
- Prerna Gupta v. Registrar General [2026] GCtR 120 (Delhi) has held that the right of an examinee to seek re-evaluation is not inherent; it is governed by the applicable statutory rules. Where the rules expressly prohibit re-evaluation, courts may interfere only in rare and exceptional cases involving demonstrable material error or manifest arbitrariness.
Anyone interested in receiving full text (PDF) Copies of all these decisions with synopsis directly on email address free of cost, please follow 2 steps : 1. Click on "Follow" option on right side of blog to become follower of this blog. 2. Mention your email address in "Comments" section of this blog post.