NCLT's Order Unsustainable : Appeal Filed by Resolution Applicant Allowed
According to S.31 (2) of IBC, 2016, NCLT has the power to reject the resolution plan. The process of fast track CIRP can be seen from the provisions of S.56 (1) where a time period of 90 days has been mentioned.
Sec. 60 (1) of IBC, 2016 for territorial jurisdiction is linked with the place where the registered office of the corporate person is located.
In a recent case of December 2023 arising out of litigation under IBC, 2016, the appeal was filed by resolution applicant challenging the Order of the NCLT.
In Express Resorts and Hotels Ltd v Amit Jain [2023] GCtR 2127 (NCLAT), the approach of NCLT in dealing with applications filed by resolution applicants was exposed. Finally, the appeal filed by Resolution applicant was allowed and NCLT's Order was termed as "unsustainable" at page 13.
Surprisingly, the entire discussion makes absolutely no mention about the ratio of Innoventive Industries Ltd v ICICI Bank [2017] GCtR 1171 (SC).
One can download full copy of the decision free of cost from the following link : -
https://nclat.nic.in/display-board/judge
Written by
Vishal
Delhi
Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters/blogs without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957. This is not to be considered as any professional legal advice and does not constitute client-attorney relationship.