Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : "Courts to be circumspect in entertaining an application under Section 9(1) after an Arbitral Tribunal has been constituted" : High Court
Many cases are related to Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
In the context of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it has been commented at page of Pacific Development Corporation Ltd v DMRC [2023] GCtR 382 (Delhi) thus : -
"Provisions of Section 9(3) of the Act would come into play only in a situation where a court is approached for the grant of interim measures after the Arbitral Tribunal has been constituted. The said provision, in fact, requires courts to be circumspect in entertaining an application under Section 9(1) after an Arbitral Tribunal has been constituted and to invoke its powers only if it finds that circumstances exist which may render the remedy under Section 17 inefficacious."
Written by
Vishal
Delhi
Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment