IBC, 2016 : Replacement of Resolution Professional Is Permissible
An important Decision was given by Chennai Bench of NCLAT on 15 December 2022 in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (INS.) No. 319 / 2022. [Available free of cost at https://nclat.nic.in/display-board/judge]
One can gather from Dr. K.V. Srinivas [2022] GCtR 1802 (NCLAT, Chennai) that replacement of Resolution Professional under IBC, 2016 is permissible.
Written by
Vishal
Delhi
Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957.
No comments:
Post a Comment