Important Legal Propositions
Sambhaji Shivaji Mali v. Hon'ble VC [2016] GCtR 6340 (Bombay) : The nature of proof required in a departmental enquiry and what is required in a criminal proceedings cannot be compared.
Siddhivinayak Audyogik Vasahat Maryadit v Murlidhar Vedu Jadhav [2016] GCtR 6341 (Bombay) : An Inam land could not have been sold without prior permission from the Government.
CEO v. Prashant Raghunath Kulkarni [2016] GCtR 6342 (Bombay) : A defective inquiry and a case of no inquiry on the same footing.
Majlis Manch v. Registrar, Family Court [2016] GCtR 6343 (Bombay) : Women are exempted from payment of court fee even in respect of claims on behalf of their male minor children, if it were to be maintenance claim.
No comments:
Post a Comment