It has been held in Rekha Kaushal v. PNB [2019] GCtR 6507 (Delhi) that delinquent officer cannot seek re-appreciation of oral and documentary evidence led during the course of departmental enquiry. It has been held that in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court cannot sit as an appellate authority over the findings of the disciplinary authority and so long as the findings of the disciplinary authority are supported by some evidence. The High Court shall not re-appreciate the evidence and come to a different and independent finding on the evidence.
Sunday, November 30, 2025
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Evidence in a Claim in Arbitral Proceedings : Supreme Court Explains the Principles
Evidence in a Claim in Arbitral Proceedings : Supreme Court Explains the Principles "While the quantum of evidence required to accept a...
-
Advocate Empanelment Notice by Government Organisation : Last Date to apply to Expire Before 16 January 2026 Advocate Empanelment Last date ...
-
Vacancy for Law Graduates in a Govt Organisation : Remuneration More than Rs. 94,500/- p.m. A Reputed Govt organisation has issued notice fo...
-
Vacancy for Law Graduates in Govt Organisation : Salary More Than Rs. 1.16 lacs per month A government organisation has issued notice for va...
No comments:
Post a Comment