High Court Issues Guidelines on Compensation

High Court Issues Guidelines on Compensation

In a recent Judgment, it was held that while dealing with sexual offences if interim compensation disbursed in cases where allegations are subsequently withdrawn or found to be false is routinely allowed to remain unrecovered, it may not only result in misuse of public funds but may also dilute the credibility and sustainability of schemes meant to support genuine victims of sexual violence.

State of GNCTD v. Toshib @ Paritosh [2025] GCtR 1865 (Delhi) 

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Provisions of Rape

 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Provisions of Rape

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 repeals Indian Penal Code, 1860 through S.358 (1) of Sanhita, 2023. It has been published in Gazette of India on 25 Dec 2023. Sec. 1(2) of Sanhita, 2023 indicates that Sanhita, 2023 has come into force on 25 December 2023.

Sec. 63 of Sanhita, 2023 explains when a man is said to commit offence of rape. S.64 provides what will be the punishment for rape. There is a minimum sentence prescribed in S.64 (1) of Sanhita, 2023. S.70 (1) provides for min. 20 years imprisonment in certain kinds of offences of rape. Body parts mentioned in S.63 are vagina, mouth, urethra or anus.  S.63 also contains 2 exceptions. 

Written by 

Vishal

Delhi

Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters/blogs without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957. This is not to be considered as any professional legal advice and does not constitute client-attorney relationship.   

POCSO Act, 2012 : Conviction of Accused Upheld by HC

 POCSO Act, 2012 : Conviction of Accused Upheld by HC

An interesting judgment has been passed on 29 March 2023.

The Judgment is passed by Hon'ble Gauhati HC in Crl.A(J)/67/2020. 

In Uday Bakali v State of Assam [2023] GCtR 877 (Gauhati), the conviction of accused for committing offences under POCSO Act, 2012 has been upheld. 

Written by 

Vishal

Delhi

Notice : Copyright of above blog and its content including headline vests with Vishal. Above should Not be reproduced in any form in newspapers/websites/Ph.D. thesis/College projects/ law firms' newsletters/law journals/books/book chapters without prior written permission. Fair use should be in terms of Copyright Act, 1957. Any violation will make violator liable for Pecuniary compensation with interest towards the author irrespective of the profit made. All disputes shall be subject to Delhi Jurisdiction. Reproduction of judgment or publication of judgment unless expressly prohibited by Court according is not an infringement of copyright according to S. 52 (1)(q)(iv) of Copyright Act, 1957.